00:08:44.470
00:08:47.930
I believe that all nations need the same thing :
(Why an additional space before the colon? Also we could think about adding an s so it becomes thingS. Fresco does not say it but in my opinion it would be grammatically better because he then gives a list of many things and not just one.)
00:13:34.060
00:13:36.900
And where do you start most values?
(Fresco seems to figure out how he can start the next sentence. So "most values" does not seem to belong to this sentence but to the next one. Maybe this phrase could be omitted entirely from this line here.
So this line here would be: "And where do you start?")
Most human values are erroneous,
except when it comes to mathematics, physics, chemistry.
Again Ossi, I agree that both these items need fixed.
The first is a straightforward typo that somehow made it past FR. There should be no space preceding the colon, but I would stop it there, and leave "thing" singular. Even though it is more properly expressed as "things" in the sentence, IMO the meaning is clear enough as is ("thing").
For the second item, yes, it is wrong as is, and further Jacque is clarifying mid-sentence afterward, which IMO calls for dashes. Here is the correction I see in one sentence:
And where do you start? Most values - most human values - are erroneous, except when it comes to mathematics, physics, chemistry.
So the corrected subs would be:
And where do you start? Most values -
most human values - are erroneous,
except when it comes to mathematics, physics, chemistry.
12:38A scientist doesn't believe in anything, neither accepts, rejects or holds in abeyance;
I believe instead of neither should be either. It seems to me that he is enumerating the possible judgments a scientist can make. With neither I would conclude that he can't have any kind of judgment as he cannot accept, reject or hold in abeyance.
I would also add a colon in Portuguese after anything, thus: A scientist doesn't believe in anything: (he) either accepts, rejects or holds in abeyance;
***************** 11:19And if our society were oriented
toward the well-being of our fellow human beings,
I cannot see these problems as being dominant,
in a society where every man works for himself,
individual incentive, working for one's self.
It does make more sense to me a period after "dominant", as Jacque seems to break there too: And if our society were oriented
toward the well-being of our fellow human beings,
I cannot see these problems as being dominant.
In a society where every man works for himself,
individual incentive, working for one's self.
This post has been edited 2 times, last edit by "zedom" (Apr 22nd 2018, 7:26pm)
